Sweepstakes Casino Controversy - And Celebrities' All-important Role
Linette MacGillivray edited this page 2 weeks ago


The smiling faces of Paris Hilton and Ryan Seacrest made surprise looks before the Louisiana Senate for Friday's hearing on illegal sports betting.

No, they weren't personally in attendance, however the world-famous stars were notably included in a slide presentation on social and sweepstakes casinos - the controversial sites using both free casino-style games and lucrative prizes, such as money, gift cards or cryptocurrency. In one ad, the fist-pumping Seacrest is seen plugging Chumba Casino, where anybody can 'bet complimentary,' while a crop-topped Hilton holds a chip for sweepstakes operator, Wow Vegas, in the other.
bet9ja.com
The sites are just 2 cogs in the multibillion-dollar industry that now finds itself besieged by suits. In the eyes of many gaming corporations, not to point out claim plaintiffs and state regulators, sweepstakes gambling establishments function as traditional casinos, only without the oversight, customer defenses and tax laws. So not just can they prevent the steep 24-percent federal gaming levy, however sweepstakes operators aren't based on regulative obstacles like anti-money laundering and responsible-gaming securities.

One operator, Australia-based Virtual Gaming Worlds (VGW), reported $4 billion in earnings last year alone. Now the business deals with accusations of illegal gaming in a New york city lawsuit that declares VGW utilizes celebrity endorsers to 'produce a veneer of legitimacy' around its product. (See VGW's statement below)

'I'm uncertain" if you do not trust us, you can rely on Paris Hilton" is a winning message for business operating multibillion-dollar prohibited operations out of places like Malta, Isle of Man, or US mail drops,' Friday's presenter, Howard Glaser of video gaming corporation Light & Wonder, told DailyMail.com.

Sweepstakes endorsers include a variety of celebrities from gambling lovers Drake and DJ Khaled to swimmer Michael Phelps, in addition to NBA stars Karl-Anthony Towns and Paul George - none of whom offer any differences between standard gaming and sweepstakes play.

Paris Hilton is seen plugging Wow Vegas, among lots of sweepstakes gambling establishments found online

Ryan Seacrest advises fans to dip into Chumba Casino, where lots of - but not all - video games are free

Drake has an offer with social sweeps gambling establishment, Stake, that he regularly touts on social media

Find out more

Donald Trump 'set to name NBA team owner as US ambassador to Italy'

Instead, advertisements generally focus around the social aspect of the casinos, while leaving out the potential for actual gambling losses.

Others tempt consumers with promises of rewards. One such operator, Stake, ran a social networks ad displaying Drake's automobiles, planes and mansions before rotating to video of the rapper playing online casino-style games.

'Daddy, why do we have so much cash?' read the very first caption on the screen.

Another caption described: 'Because I never quit.'

The inconsistency between gambling websites and social or sweepstakes casinos is a bit complicated, however operators of the latter insist they're not included with the previous.

A spokesperson for a market trade group, the Social and Promotional Gaming Association (SPGA), discussed its members are not in direct competitors with online gambling establishments and sportsbooks. Furthermore, according to SPGA information, many of the gamers on social-sweepstakes casinos are playing for totally free.

'Most social sweeps customers never ever buy,' the SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com. 'The minority of clients who make purchases do so in amounts far smaller than the common deposit or wager size at real-money online gaming sites.'

Social casinos provide consumers an opportunity to play casino-style games with good friends. Players have the choice to purchase valueless currency frequently described as 'gold coins,' which can not be exchanged genuine cash, but can be utilized to open different features within the games.

But within the world of social gambling establishments exists sweepstakes gaming, enabling clients to obtain other currency understood as 'sweeps coins' that can be exchanged for cash or other rewards.

And therein lies the potential for financial losses, like the ones declared by complainants in Florida, Georgia, New Jersey and New York. One player informed the Washington Post he lost more than $100,000 on sweepstakes casinos in the previous year after continuing to buy more coins in pursuit of money and other things of value.

The Philadelphia 76ers' Paul George is seen promoting a Worldwide Poker event

Social sweeps gambling establishment Stake ran an advertisement showing off Drake's cars and trucks, aircrafts and estates

Karl-Anthony Towns of the New York City Knicks is another NBA star plugging VGW's Global Poker

Traditional online gambling establishments are banned in all however 7 states, which has assisted to fuel the popularity of sweepstakes gambling establishments.

Anyone over the age of 18 can access the sweepstakes websites, which do not need generally require recognition. However, sites like Chumba will ask for IDs from gamers trying to withdraw any funds.

Many sites, like the crypto-compatible Stake, permit consumers to submit mail-in requests for totally free sweeps coins, offered the gamers follow painfully particular guidelines. What's more, gamers are frequently rewarded with sweeps coins simply for signing up, thereby providing a reason to attempt their hands at any variety of gambling establishment games for a possibility to win - or lose - real cash.

So why are sweepstakes sites enabled to run in 48 states, while online casinos are banned in all but 7?

According to the stakeholders, their item is the free casino-style video gaming, and the real-stakes competition is simply a way of promoting their bread and butter.

'Social sweepstakes games are just a type of online home entertainment,' an SPGA spokesperson told DailyMail.com by email. 'No purchase is needed to dip into social gambling establishments with sweepstakes prizes. Consumers never ever need to spend for an opportunity to win prizes. That absence of a purchase requirement - or" consideration" - is a crucial difference in between social sweeps and conventional online gambling websites like casinos.'
bet9ja.com
Consider the method that McDonald's uses its annual Monopoly game to promote its food: Customers aren't paying to bet, but rather they're purchasing hamburgers and french fries that offer them the possibility to win lucrative prizes, such as a $1 million prize.

And without a purchase requirement, or 'factor to consider', the game itself does not satisfy the definition of gaming in the US.

'Sweepstakes are a long-standing technique for promoting all type of everyday companies in the United States, everything from burgers to magazine memberships to coffee and home improvement shops,' the SPGA representative informed DailyMail.com. 'Sweepstakes promotions are routinely used by a who's who of home names like AT&T, Chase, Home Depot, Marriott, Starbucks, and Wal-Mart.'

But to lots of gambling industry experts, that argument does not cut it.

For beginners, video gaming attorney Daniel Wallach explains, McDonald's Monopoly game doesn't run indefinitely. Rather, it has a well-defined start and end, thereby suggesting the sweepstakes is not the fast-food giant's main product. Instead, the sweepstakes is being used to promote genuine products like fries, shakes, and the Filet-O-Fish.

'They don't last forever and they're normally not connected to casino-style video games of possibility,' Wallach informed DailyMail.com. 'They're simply cash free gifts.
bet9ja.com
'The sweepstakes [gambling establishments] possess none of the characteristics typically connected with McDonald's-style sweepstakes promos,' Wallach continued. 'Besides running in eternity, the sweepstakes gambling establishments use" casino-like" payouts, normally 80 percent or more of incomes, whereas the normal payment portion for a temporary promotional sweepstakes is an unimportant share of the earnings earned by the business [typically less than one percent]'

Wallach fasts to liken the online social sweeps casinos to the web cafes that emerged in Florida, using customers the chance to play casino-style video games for genuine prizes. A number of those brick-and-mortar facilities have actually given that been shuttered over accusations of illegal gaming.

DJ Khaled is among numerous star spokespeople for VGW's Global Poker brand name
bit.ly
Now, Wallach argues, social sweeps gambling establishments need to deal with similar analysis.

'These differences are not approximate,' Wallach stated of social sweeps casinos. 'They have actually consistently been pointed out by courts and state attorney generals as crucial elements in determining that a sweepstakes promotion remained in fact a guise for illegal sports betting.'

Among the casino market's leading trade organizations, the American Gaming Association, is now pushing lawmakers to examine sweepstakes operators and, sometimes, enact new legislation on the issue.

'Consumers are being denied of defenses and states are passing up considerable tax and earnings chances as this sports betting replaces that conducted through controlled channels,' read a well-circulated AGA memo.

And after that there are the complainants who have taken legal action against social casinos in more than a lots states.

Sweepstakes gambling establishment operators paid a combined $14.2 million in four separate cases in Kentucky without admitting any misdeed, according to the Washington Post. Meanwhile VGW consented to pay $11.75 million in one class-action suit, saying the settlement was made to prevent legal costs and continued lawsuits.

Michael Phelps has signed a deal with the VGW Group, which owns Global Poker

In the most recent suit, which is mostly similar to its predecessors, New york city state locals Lamar Prater and Rebecca Pratt both declare to have actually lost well over $1,000 to VGW, which is explained in the filing as an 'unlawful gaming business. '

Apple and Google have likewise been named as defendants in claims for hosting the sweepstakes sites. But unlike VGW, neither tech business responded to DailyMail.com's request for remark.

'We normally do not discuss matters before the courts,' a VGW spokesperson told DailyMail.com by means of email. 'However, we note that this claim has actually only simply been filed with the court and VGW has not been officially served.

'We have full confidence in our compliance with all laws and policies where we operate, and remain positive about the future,' the spokesperson continued. 'We continue to provide our free-to-play video games throughout the majority of The United States and Canada, as we have for more than a decade, producing not only fantastic video games, user experiences and entertainment, however likewise guaranteeing this is done securely, properly and at the highest level of standards.

'More broadly, we 'd reiterate that class actions and other litigations and arbitrations are relatively common throughout the online social games market (and the US more broadly), and our standard practice is that we intend to strongly protect any claim which might be brought versus us.'

The problems between traditional online gaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments could show troublesome for some celeb endorsers.

Towns, a star center with the Knicks, and the 76ers' George both endorse VGW's Global Poker brand while the NBA is partnered with traditional video gaming titans like FanDuel and DraftKings.

'It's paradoxical that professional athletes are hawking prohibited sports betting 'sweeps' sites while at the very same time the leagues desire to project a strong position against prohibited gaming - particularly when attempting to tamp down the periodic gambling scandal,' Glaser told DailyMail.com.

It was simply eight months ago that Toronto Raptors forward Jontay Porter got a life time ban from the NBA over allegations he conspired with gamblers. However, to be clear, Porter's scandal is unassociated to anything involving social or sweepstakes casinos.

In addition to VGW, Apple and Google are being sued for hosting allegedly unlawful gambling websites

Regardless, Glaser sees sweepstakes gambling establishments as a significant issue for leagues such as the NBA.

'I 'd anticipate that a league crackdown on professional athletes endorsing sweepstakes sites is a matter of when, not if,' Glaser added.

Neither an NBA representative nor the gamers' representatives responded to DailyMail.com's requests for remark. For that matter, spokespeople for Drake, DJ Khaled, Hilton, Seacrest and Phelps also neglected to respond to DailyMail.com emails.

Asked if their have a duty to describe to clients the differences and similarities in between iGaming and sweepstakes gambling establishments, VGW firmly insisted there is absolutely nothing more that requires to be done.

'We have complete self-confidence in our influencer and ambassadorial partnerships, and our organization practices more broadly,' the spokesperson said. 'Some of our worths are" our players precede" and" we do what's right", and we put our values at the core of whatever we do.'

Glaser, an outspoken opponent of sweepstakes sites, sees things differently.
bet9ja.com
'Celebrities who lend their names to shady unlawful gambling sites are, at a minimum, putting their credibilities at risk along with courting civil and class actions by customers who allege harm,' Glaser said. 'There is also some risk that state regulators and state attorney generals of the United States rope star endorsers into enforcement efforts for assisting in illegal gaming.'

New YorkNBADrakeParis Hilton
bit.ly